Rhode Island Rethinks Bill to Criminalize Under-21 iGaming

A Surprising Second Chance

Pushed by the state police, the bill targets 18- to 20-year-olds playing online, despite their legal ability to gamble in-person at casinos. “Not want kids doing this,” said Committee Chairman Robert Craven, citing concerns about phone-addicted youth.

The rare move to reconsider, set for late April, gives Col. Darnell Weaver a chance to argue for the bill.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Rhode Island and the Public Defender’s Office led the opposition, joined by Rep. Cherie Cruz and Minority Representative David Place.

Critics argue it’s unfair to slap criminal records on young adults for online gambling, especially when they might not know it’s illegal.

Critics Push for Education Over Punishment

Megan Jackson, legislative liaison for the Public Defender’s Office, warned that the bill could confuse 18- to 20-year-olds, as current law sets 21 as the iGaming age but lacks separate penalties for this group. “Creating a distinct offense for 18- to 20-year-olds engaging in online gaming could lead to significant confusion, making it challenging for them to navigate the legal framework effectively,” Jackson said.

She urged education and harm reduction, like civil fines with mandatory gambling addiction courses. Most committee members agreed, rejecting the original bill.

The bill’s focus on youth protection clashes with its potential to penalize legal casino gamblers for playing on phones. Critics fear the law could drive young players to unregulated sites, risking $50 million in losses, per casinoreports.com.

The decision to reconsider, backed by House Rule 12, allows members who voted with the majority to request a revote while the bill remains in committee.

Larry Berman, House spokesperson, confirmed that several members, plus two who missed the first vote, support the move. However, David Place questioned its timing, citing Mason’s Rules of Procedure, which suggest reconsideration at the next meeting, held April 24. Berman clarified that House rules take precedence.