NBA Warns CFTC on Unregulated Sports Prediction Markets

Author: Mateusz Mazur

Date: 02.05.2025

The National Basketball Association fired off a detailed letter to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, first flagged by law expert Daniel Wallach, raising a big red flag about the runaway growth of sports prediction markets.

Sounding the Alarm

As pointed out by the NBA, these platforms, which let users bet on game outcomes or season-long events, are exploding without sport-specific rules to keep things legit.

The NBA’s worried that this free-for-all, driven by a “self-certification” process, could mess with game integrity, and they’re pushing the CFTC to clamp down.

“While the longest running NBA prediction markets have covered full-season events, the number and type of available markets are expanding at a rapid pace,” the NBA wrote, noting single-game bets are now live, with player prop markets or even bets on refs’ calls or injuries likely next.

“This expansion, which has proceeded entirely via the self-certification process, suggests to us that player proposition markets or other potential markets are not far behind.”

Gaps in Oversight

The NBA’s core beef is that prediction markets, run by exchanges under the CFTC’s broad financial oversight, lack the sport-specific guardrails baked into state-regulated sports betting.

“Without oversight and regulation tailored to the specific circumstances of sports wagering, the integrity risks posed by sports prediction markets are more significant and more difficult to manage than those presented by legal, regulated sports gambling,” the letter states.

Unlike state gaming boards, which require upfront approval for new betting markets, exchanges can roll out exotic contracts via self-certification, leaving the CFTC to play catch-up.

There’s no mandate for exchanges to flag shady trades or share data with leagues, either. “We are not aware of any requirement that either exchanges or brokers report potentially suspicious trades or trading patterns to an affected league or cooperate with any league-run investigations,” the NBA noted.

And while states have dedicated betting regulators, “there is no CFTC division dedicated to overarching, sports-specific oversight of these new betting markets.”

Why It Matters

The NBA sees a ticking time bomb. Prediction markets are diving into granular bets that could tempt manipulation without tight controls. State-regulated sportsbooks face strict checks, but CFTC’s one-size-fits-all approach doesn’t cut it for sports.

“The way new contracts come to market offers a stark contrast: exchanges can launch new, more exotic sports prediction markets via self-certification, which puts the burden of initiating any post-launch review on the CFTC,” the letter explains.

This hands-off vibe risks dodgy markets slipping through, unlike the proactive vetting states demand.

The league’s not calling for a ban but wants the CFTC to step up. “If the CFTC does ultimately decide to permit the continued offering of sports event contracts, we encourage it to close this gap and to adopt a comprehensive regulatory and oversight framework analogous to those governing state sports betting markets,” the NBA urged, pushing for limits on wild, unchecked market expansions.