Minnesota Sports Betting Legislation Stalls as Senate Committee Fails to Advance Bill
Efforts to legalize sports betting in Minnesota have hit a roadblock after a key bill failed to move forward in the Senate State and Local Government Committee. Despite broad support from tribal nations, racetracks, charities, and major sportsbook operators, the legislation introduced by Senator Matt Klein did not secure the necessary votes to advance.
A Deadlocked Vote Halts Progress
The committee’s 6-6 vote resulted in a stalemate, preventing the bill from progressing to the next stage of the legislative process.
Unlike many past votes on gambling expansion, the division was not strictly along party lines. This suggests that concerns over problem gambling, regulation, and market impact played a key role in the decision.
Klein’s bill aimed to legalize both retail and online sports betting while ensuring that tribal nations, racetracks, and other stakeholders had a role in the industry.
He emphasized that the rare unified support from these groups made the proposal particularly strong. However, opposition from some lawmakers, particularly those concerned about the social impact of gambling addiction, stalled its momentum.
Concerns Over Gambling Addiction and Market Regulations
Opponents of the bill raised several concerns, particularly the potential for increased gambling addiction with easy access to online sports betting.
They cited risks such as higher rates of debt, bankruptcies, and domestic issues linked to gambling expansion. Some lawmakers also expressed unease over how revenues from sports betting would be allocated, with differing opinions on whether funds should support tourism, addiction treatment, or other state initiatives.
Sen. Marty’s Proposal Faces Similar Challenges
Senator John Marty introduced a competing bill that proposed stricter regulations on the industry. His legislation sought to increase consumer protections, limit advertising, and direct more tax revenue toward gambling addiction treatment. However, this bill also failed to advance.
One of the key differences between the two proposals was their approach to regulation. Klein’s bill allowed for a more open market with sportsbook-friendly policies, while Marty’s proposal imposed tighter restrictions and a complete ban on college sports betting.
Marty also pushed for stricter limits on gambling advertising, including prohibiting sportsbook ads in public venues like stadiums.
With neither bill advancing, sports betting legalization in Minnesota remains stalled. The House has yet to introduce a similar measure, making it unlikely that any legislation will pass this year.
Recommended