AGA Pushes for a Seat at CFTC’s Roundtable on Sports Event Futures
According to Sportico, the American Gaming Association (AGA) has formally requested a seat at the upcoming Commodities Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) roundtable, voicing strong opposition to the expansion of sports event futures markets. The AGA argues that these financial instruments pose an “unfair economic threat” to licensed sportsbooks and closely resemble traditional sports betting without adhering to state regulations.
Why Is AGA Concerned?
The AGA is concerned that sports event futures, offered by companies like Kalshi and Crypto.com, operate too similarly to sports betting but under a different regulatory framework. These markets allow users to buy and sell contracts based on future sports outcomes, yet they are not subject to the same state-level taxes, consumer protections, or legal restrictions that traditional sportsbooks must follow.
The AGA argues that this creates an uneven playing field, allowing fintech-backed prediction markets to bypass laws that apply to sportsbooks while still offering a gambling-like product.
Another major concern is the potential violation of tribal gaming rights in states such as California, Florida, and New Mexico, where Native American groups hold exclusive licenses for sports betting. The AGA believes that allowing sports event futures under federal oversight could undermine state agreements and lead to legal conflicts between tribal operators and fintech firms.
Additionally, the association warns that these markets lack essential consumer protections, leaving bettors vulnerable to unregulated financial risks and potential fraud.
CFTC’s Changing Stance on Event Futures
The CFTC has traditionally been cautious about event-based futures contracts, particularly those linked to politics and sports. However, under the leadership of Caroline Pham, the agency has signaled a new approach that focuses on innovation and clear regulatory guidelines rather than strict enforcement.
Pham has criticized past regulatory strategies as being overly restrictive, arguing that prediction markets can provide valuable insights into public sentiment and economic forecasting.
Instead of banning these contracts outright, she has advocated for structured oversight that balances market innovation with consumer protections. The upcoming roundtable is part of this effort, gathering industry leaders, legal experts, and regulators to discuss how event futures should be classified, regulated, and monitored moving forward.
The roundtable will address key questions, including whether sports and political event futures should be classified as financial instruments or gambling products.
Regulators will also examine how these markets impact financial stability, public policy, and risk management. The discussion will explore potential regulatory frameworks, including whether the CFTC should provide official legal pathways for event futures while enforcing stricter consumer safeguards.
Recommended