Wyoming Considers Alternatives to Banning College Prop Bets

The Debate on Banning College Prop Bets

College prop betting has sparked considerable debate across the United States. The NCAA has advocated for banning such bets, suggesting it as a method to protect college athletes from harassment.

However, the Wyoming Gaming Commission (WGC) has not reached a definitive decision on this issue. While some commissioners see potential benefits in a ban, they also acknowledge that it may not fully eliminate the problem.

The WGC has also considered the unintended consequences of a ban, such as the possibility of driving bettors to the black market. Scott Ward, representing the Sports Betting Alliance, pointed out that offshore operators would likely ignore such bans, potentially attracting bettors who seek to place these wagers.

Evaluating Different Approaches

In their deliberations, the WGC examined two potential strategies. The “Ohio Solution” proposes a complete ban on college prop bets, whereas the “Iowa Solution” restricts bets only on in-state college athletes. Michael Steinberg, the operations manager, noted that while action is needed, the effectiveness of a ban on reducing harassment remains uncertain.

Discussions with NCAA and University of Wyoming representatives revealed mixed insights. The NCAA suggested that Ohio’s ban had positive effects, though no concrete data was provided. Meanwhile, University of Wyoming officials indicated that not all harassment incidents are linked to betting.

Given the inconclusive nature of their findings, Wyoming commissioners are considering alternative measures to combat athlete harassment. This could involve implementing rules similar to those in Ohio and West Virginia, which target individuals who harass athletes directly.